There's a specific kind of panic that only security leaders understand.

It’s late and your CEO just forwarded you an email from the acquisition team's lawyers. "Security Due Diligence Requirements - Need by Friday."

Or maybe it's from your VP of Sales: "Our biggest prospect just sent over their security questionnaire. They want a recent pen test report. Do we have one?"

Or the VP of Engineering: "We're launching the new API publicly next Monday. Can you make sure it's secure?"

In all three scenarios, you have the same problem: You need security validation and attestation, and you need it yesterday. We'll leave aside how you wring someone’s neck for making this your headache at the 11th hour.

Security testing always seems to happen on a compliance calendar that has nothing to do with business events. You do your annual pen test in Q2 because that's when you've always done it, completely disconnected from the fact that your company is raising a Series B in Q3, launching a major product in Q4, or being acquired in Q1.

Here's what separates strategic CISOs from tactical ones: They don't wait for high-stakes events to happen and then scramble for security validation. They anticipate these moments and position security testing as an accelerant rather than a blocker.

Let’s talk about how to use penetration testing as a strategic weapon during these crunch-time moments.

High-Stakes Moments Where Security Testing Changes Outcomes

Fundraising

Investors aren't security experts, but they know, or are concerned, that security incidents impact valuations. When you're raising capital - Series A all the way through IPO - they will ask about security. They want proof you're not a ticking time bomb.

And the questions are predictable:

• Have you had a recent third-party security assessment? 
• What were the findings?
• How did you remediate them?
• Do you have any outstanding critical vulnerabilities?

You can imagine being in the final due diligence stages for a large Series B. Investors ask for your most recent pen test. Maybe you don't have one (unlikely at this stage, looks immature if you don’t), have one from 18 months ago (quite stale), or have one from two months ago with high findings you haven’t yet remediated (raising prioritization questions). Any of these could delay the round.

The fix is timing. Get a pen test schedule 3 to 4 months before you plan to start fundraising conversations. Find issues on a controlled timeline and environment. Remediate critical and high findings and address the rest (“compensating controls” or quick fixes). Retest to validate them.

Now you walk into investor meetings with documentation that says: "We proactively assessed our security posture, identified gaps, and resolved them. Here's the before and after."

This kind of operational excellence builds confidence with those writing checks.

Mergers & Acquisitions

If you're being acquired, the buyer will conduct security due diligence. They want to know what liabilities they're inheriting. Outstanding security vulnerabilities can reduce the purchase price, delay the transaction, kill the deal entirely, or create indemnification requirements that leave you on the hook for post-acquisition breaches.

If you're acquiring, you need to know what you're buying. Acquiring a company with significant security debt means inheriting its vulnerabilities, their potential breach liability, and their remediation costs. We’ve seen those occur where the buyer didn’t realize the current environment was compromised at the time of sale.

Here's how these deals can go wrong: You're being acquired for a healthy sum. During due diligence, the buyer's security team does an authorized internal penetration test and finds critical vulnerabilities. Now you're negotiating price reductions ("These systemic vulnerabilities represent millions in remediation costs"), escrow holdbacks ("We're holding seven figures for 12 months in case there's a breach"), or watching the deal die entirely.

Run a pen test months before you plan to go to market. Month one: test. Months two through four: remediate all findings, then retest and validate fixes. Finally, you begin buyer conversations with clean security documentation. When the buyer does their due diligence pen test (and they will), they find a robust environment.

If you're acquiring, make penetration testing a mandatory part of due diligence. Budget for it upfront. Conduct it early, not at the last minute. Use those findings to inform purchase price negotiations and create a remediation roadmap for post-acquisition integration.

Pro tip: Remember the "Industry Response" timing window? If you're acquiring a company right after a major breach in their industry, your due diligence pen test should specifically focus on whether they're vulnerable to that attack vector or threat actor group.

Major Product Launches

New code means new attack surface. Launching publicly means attracting attention, from customers, competitors - and attackers. If you launch with security vulnerabilities, you're discovering them under the worst possible conditions: in production, with customers affected, with potential regulatory implications.

You launch your new app. TechCrunch covers it. You get thousands of signups in the first week. Days later a security researcher posts that your API has broken authentication and anyone can access any user's data. Now you're doing incident response, customer notification, PR crisis management, and scrambling to fix it.

Test in staging four to six weeks before launch. You find vulnerabilities in a controlled environment. You fix issues without delaying launch. You launch clean. You don’t suffer egg on your face.

Some internal framing that helps win support for this: "We're investing $2M in developing this feature and $500K in launch marketing. A $30K pen test ensures we don't launch with a vulnerability that kills that investment. It's insurance on a $2.5M bet, and will be necessary as we sell to enterprise."

Then, when you launch, you can include security testing in your narrative. Sales materials: "Thoroughly tested for security vulnerabilities before public release. Attestation letter available on our Trust Center after NDA" Customer FAQs: "Yes, we conduct third-party security testing on all major releases."

What you need from your security vendor

• Fast turnaround - product launches don't wait for long lead times
• Developer-friendly reporting - your engineering team needs to understand and fix issues quickly
• Flexibility to quickly retest after fixes and sharable attestation

Enterprise Sales Cycles

Enterprise deals are high-value, long sales cycles. If you can't answer security questions in a way that satisfies mature security teams, you likely don't get to the contract stage. Security documentation isn't just compliance—it's revenue enablement.

It’s happened before. You're in the final stages of a six-figure deal and month six of this sales cycle. Your champion is bought in and legal is reviewing the contract. Then procurement sends over their security questionnaire. Question 47: "Please provide your most recent penetration test report, conducted within the last 12 months." Oh, and the security team wants to visit with you probably to ask detailed questions about your backend environment.

Maybe you don't have that report. Or you have one from two years ago. Or the one you have hasn’t had any major findings remediated. The deal stalls. The deal dies. The deal gets pushed to the next budget cycle. The cost isn't just the lost contract size - it's the sales effort, the acquisition costs, the opportunity costs - all because of a $40K pen test you didn't do.

Maintain a rolling 12-month pentest cadence specifically so you always have recent documentation for enterprise sales. Some companies time their pen tests around their primary selling season: if you sell heavily in Q4, do your pen test in Q3.

Work with your sales team to create a security documentation package that lives in your sales enablement library or Trust Center.

• Executive summary of your most recent pen test (sanitized, no technical details)
• Attestation letter from your pen test vendor. Your remediation process and timeline
• SOC 2 report if applicable

Now when procurement asks for security documentation, your rep sends it immediately instead of waiting weeks for the security team to pull it together.

Pro tip: Remember the "Business Enablement" budget bucket? This is it. When you're justifying pen test budget, you can point to deals that require it: "Last quarter, N prospects asked for pen test documentation. That's $YM in pipeline that required this investment."

Customer Security Incidents in Your Industry

When a competitor or similar company gets breached, some percentage of your customers get spooked and want reassurance. If you can't provide credible answers quickly, they may start looking for alternatives. This is both a risk (customer churn) and an opportunity (competitive differentiation). And there’s the concern of increased targeting by copycat threat actors attempting the same techniques on others in the industry.

Imagine your competitor gets breached via SQL injection (yes, even in today’s day and age). Your largest customer emails your account team: "We use similar technology. Can you confirm you're not vulnerable to the same attack vector?" 

You have no recent pen test. You can't definitively say you're not vulnerable. Your reassurance sounds like guessing: "We think we're okay, we follow security best practices, we have no evidence of breach, etc." Your customer starts RFP processes for alternatives.

When major industry incidents occur, request a targeted pen test prioritizing the relevant threat actor and focusing on that attack vector. If appropriate to your business model, proactively reach out to customers and assure them they’re not at risk of the same issue.

What you need from your security vendor

• Ability to mobilize quickly (days, not weeks)
• Specific expertise in the relevant attack vector
• Willingness to provide customer-facing attestation letters
• Fast turnaround on targeted testing

Remember the "Industry Response" timing window we discussed? This is the scenario. When you have a vendor relationship that supports fast-turnaround targeted testing, you can respond to industry incidents with validation instead of platitudes.

Regulatory Compliance Deadlines

Compliance certifications often directly unlock revenue. SOC 2 unlocks enterprise sales.  GovRAMP, FedRAMP, and CMMC unlock federal sales. But the relationship between these frameworks and penetration testing is more nuanced than most people realize.

PCI DSS and FedRAMP explicitly require penetration testing—annually at minimum, and after significant system changes. For PCI DSS, it's Requirement 11 - if you handle cardholder data, you must conduct pen tests. For FedRAMP, it's part of both initial authorization and continuous monitoring, and it must be performed by an accredited third-party assessment organization. FTC Safeguards Rule (GLBA), NYDFS, and DORA (EU) also spell out pentesting requirements.

SOC 2, on the other hand, doesn't technically mandate penetration testing. The Trust Service Criteria offer flexibility in how you demonstrate control effectiveness. But the practical reality is that most auditors expect it. When they're evaluating whether your security controls actually work and not just whether they exist on paper, a pen test is credible evidence.

HIPAA is in transition. Historically, penetration testing has been strongly recommended but not explicitly required. The Security Rule calls for "technical evaluations" without specifying methodology. However, proposed updates published would make annual pen testing mandatory for all covered entities and business associates. If those rules are finalized, healthcare organizations will need to budget accordingly.

The strategic implication is the same regardless of whether a framework technically mandates testing: if your certification or authorization matters to revenue, don't let the pen test become the bottleneck.

Run your pen test 90-120 days before your compliance deadline so you’re not remediating during the audit window or rushing fixes without time for validation. Month one: pen test conducted. Month two: remediate findings. Month three: retest validates fixes. Month four: audit with clean documentation. Delays in certification are delays in revenue.

Three-Month Runways

Across all of these scenarios, 90 days is the sweet spot for pre-event pen testing.

• Weeks 1-2: Testing occurs. Initial findings discovered. Critical issues escalated in real-time.
• Week 3: Full report delivered with executive summary and remediation recommendations.
• Weeks 4-8: Remediation sprint. Critical findings fixed immediately. Highs fixed within two to three weeks. Mediums prioritized and addressed.
• Weeks 9-10: Retest validates that fixes actually work. Clean bill of health from your vendor.
• Weeks 11-12: Documentation and prep. Executive summaries for investors, buyers, or customers. Updated security documentation package. Relevant stakeholders briefed.
• Week 13+: The event above. You walk in with clean, recent, validated security documentation. You control the narrative.

Compress that runway to 60 days, and it's tight but doable. Compress to 30 days and you're gambling with findings, remediation gaps, and retesting. Extend beyond 6 months, and your results start to go stale since most parties want pen tests from within the last 12 months.

How to Identify Your High-Stakes Moments Before They Sneak Up

The CISOs who do this well aren't reacting. They're anticipating.

At the beginning of each year or quarter, sit down with leadership and map out business events: compliance audits, product launches, major sales prospects in pipeline, M&A activity (even if just rumored), fundraising targets, new market entry, industry conferences where you'll be pitching.

Then work backwards. For each high-stakes event, subtract 90 days—that's when you need to kick off your pen test. Subtract another month for vendor procurement and scoping.

Try our Strategic Testing Timeline Planner → adversis.github.io/testing-timeline

For example

• Fundraising target: September
• Subtract 90 days: Pen test needs to start in June
• Subtract another month for vendor procurement and scoping: Begin vendor conversations in May

Have "Pre-Mortem" Conversations with Business Leaders

This is where strategic CISOs separate from tactical ones. Schedule 30-minute conversations with:

• Your CEO/CFO: "What are the major business milestones in the next 12 months where security validation would be valuable?"
• Your VP Sales: "What enterprise deals are in pipeline that might require security documentation?"
• Your VP Product: "What are the major launches this year, and which ones increase our attack surface?"
• Your VP Engineering: "What architectural changes are planned that we should validate for security?"

You're gathering intelligence so you can position security testing as a business accelerant.

Watch for Trigger Phrases

When you hear these phrases in leadership meetings, your ears should perk up:

• "We're exploring a potential acquisition..."
• "We might raise a Series X in Q..."
• "We're launching [major product] in..."
• "We're pursuing [compliance certification]..."
• "We're pitching [enterprise customer]..."
• "We're entering the [regulated market] space..."

Each of these is a trigger for: "We should discuss security validation timing for this."

Vendor Capabilities That Matter for High-Stakes Testing

Not all pen test vendors are set up to support high-stakes business events.

Fast mobilization. You need a vendor who can start testing within two to three weeks, not six to eight. High-stakes events don't always give you three months notice. Acquisition opportunities emerge quickly. Product launches get accelerated. You need a vendor who can move fast.

Ask: "If I call you today with an urgent need, what's your fastest time to start testing?" and look for answers like “For existing clients with urgent needs, we can typically mobilize within 1-2 weeks."

Flexible scoping. Growth-stage startups rarely need a checkbox pen test. What you actually need is a product security assessment that covers the full picture: your application, the infrastructure it runs on, a threat model that maps how attackers would actually approach your product, and lightweight SAST/DAST to catch the obvious stuff before manual testing begins. 

Ask: "Can you scope an engagement that gives me a high ROI with some application testing, infrastructure review, and threat modeling - or do you only sell point-in-time pen tests?"

Fast report turnaround. Every day your report is delayed is a day you can't start remediation. When you're on a 90-day timeline, three-week report delays kill that buffer. 

Ask: "What's your typical turnaround from test completion to report delivery?" You want 3-4 business days, not 1-2 weeks.

Included retest hours. For high-stakes events, you need validation that your fixes worked. "We fixed it" isn't credible. "We fixed it and had it retested clean and here’s our report" is credible. 

Ask: "Are retest hours included in your standard engagement? How soon must we re-engage you?” Look for “yes, of course, we’re happy to help architect those resolutions any time in the next year.”

Customer-facing documentation. You can't hand a 100-page technical report to a VC or customer. You need executive summaries and attestation letters.

Ask: "Can you provide customer-facing documentation like attestation letters or executive summaries?" Look for "yes, of course, and we can work with you on specific documentation needs for due diligence or customer assurance."

Real-time communication. Critical findings should be escalated immediately during testing, not held until the report. If you're days from a Series B close and your pen test finds a critical vulnerability, you need to know today. 

Ask: "If you find a critical vulnerability during testing, what's your escalation process?" Look for “Critical and high-severity findings are escalated immediately via Slack/phone/email to your designated contact.”

Real-World Examples

Let me show you what this looks like in practice:

A Series B Pen Test

Company: B2B SaaS, 50 employees, $8M ARR, targeting Series B

Timeline

• January: CEO tells CISO they're planning to raise Series B in May
• January: CISO begins vendor selection for pen test
• February: Pen test conducted (full web app + infrastructure)
• Early March: Report delivered - 1 critical, 4 highs, 12 mediums
• March: Engineering remediates critical and all 4 highs
• Early April: Retest validates fixes
• Late April: CISO prepares security documentation package for due diligence
• May: Series B fundraising begins

Due Diligence

Investor asks: "What's your security posture?"

CISO provides:

• Pen test executive summary showing 1 critical, 4 highs found and remediated
• Retest validation showing clean results
• Documentation of security processes and controls

The investor sees a mature company that proactively finds and fixes security issues.

Result

Series B closes without security-related delays. CISO gets credit for smooth due diligence process.

A counterfactual

If the CISO had waited until April to do the pen test, the critical finding would have been discovered during investor due diligence. Best case: deal delay. Worst case: valuation reduction or deal termination.

‍

The Acquisition Prep

Company: Healthcare tech startup, being acquired for $45M

Timeline

• July: Board member mentions acquisition interest from larger company
• August: CISO commissions pen test in anticipation of due diligence
• September: Pen test finds 2 criticals (unpatched server, broken access control)
• September-October: Both criticals remediated, plus 8 of 10 highs
• November: Retest shows clean results on criticals, remaining 2 highs documented with remediation plan
• December: Acquisition discussions formalize, due diligence begins
• January: Buyer conducts their own pen test as part of due diligence

Due Diligence

Buyer's pen test finds: 2 low-severity findings (both known and already scheduled for remediation)

Buyer sees: Company that takes security seriously, proactively tests, and remediates issues. The buyer's security team recommends proceeding.

Result

Acquisition closes at full $45M valuation. No security-related price reductions or deal delays.

A counterfactual

If CISO had not done pre-acquisition pen test, buyer's due diligence would have found the 2 criticals. At minimum, this creates price reduction leverage: "We're deducting $2M for security remediation." At worst, it kills the deal.

‍

A Product Launch

Company: Fintech startup launching payment processing feature

Timeline

• Q1: Product team plans to launch payment processing in Q3
• Q1: Security team identifies PCI DSS requirements (including pen testing)
• Early Q2: Pen test conducted in staging environment, focused on payment flows
• Mid Q2: Findings include 1 critical (sensitive data in logs) and 3 highs
• Late Q2: All critical/high findings remediated
• Early Q3: Retest in staging validates fixes
• Mid Q3: Product launches publicly with payment processing

Launch announcement includes

"Our payment processing feature was built with security-first design and independently tested before launch to ensure customer data protection."

Result

Clean launch. Zero security incidents. Feature adoption is strong because customers trust the security.

A counterfactual

If security testing happened post-launch, the critical finding (sensitive data in logs) would have been discovered in production, potentially with real customer data exposed. That's incident response, regulatory notification, customer trust damage—all avoidable.

‍

Getting Buy-In for Pre-Mortem Testing

Here's the conversation you need to have with your CEO or CFO:

You: "I want to talk about how we use penetration testing strategically - not just compliance."

CEO: "What do you mean?"

You: "Right now we do annual pen testing because we need it for SOC 2. That's table stakes. But we have several high-stakes business events coming up where security validation could make or break the outcome.

CEO: "Like what?"

You: "Three examples:

First, if we're serious about raising Series B in Q3, investors will do security due diligence. If we test now and remediate before fundraising, we control the narrative. If we wait and they find issues during due diligence, it creates delay or valuation risk.

Second, we're launching [major product] in Q2. If we test in staging before launch and find issues, we fix them quietly. If we launch and then find issues, we're doing incident response with customers affected.

Third, we have $2M in enterprise pipeline that will ask for recent pen test documentation. If we can say 'yes, here it is, all findings remediated,' we close deals faster. If we have to say 'we're working on it,' deals stall.

The difference between reactive and proactive testing is timing. It's the same budget, just strategically deployed."

CEO: "How much does this cost?"

You: "A targeted pre-event pen test is $40-80K depending on depth. Compare that to the value at risk: $20M fundraise, $2M product launch investment, $2M sales pipeline. The testing pays for itself if it prevents a single deal delay or issue."

CEO: "What do you need from me?"

You: "Two things: First, visibility into upcoming high-stakes events so I can plan testing timing. Second, when I say 'we need to test this before launch,' I need support to protect the timeline."

CEO: "Done. What's first?"

You're not asking for more budget. You're asking to use existing budget more strategically. And you're connecting security testing directly to business outcomes the CEO cares about.

The Long Game

Once you've successfully done pre-mortem testing for one high-stakes event, you build a pattern. The business starts to expect it.

Initially: You do pre-Series B testing. It goes well. Leadership sees the value.

Then: You do pre-acquisition testing without being asked. Leadership appreciates the foresight.

Next: Your VP Product comes to you: "We're launching X in Q2. Should we test it first?" Now you've got pull, not push.

Finally: Your CFO budgets for pre-event testing automatically. It's not a request anymore; it's expected.

You're training the organization that strategic security testing is how mature companies operate.

The Bottom Line

Most companies do penetration testing because they have to. They're checking a box for compliance, customers, or auditors.

Strategic companies do penetration testing because it unlocks what they want to do. It enables fundraising. It de-risks acquisitions. It validates launches. It closes deals.

The difference isn't the test itself, but the timing. It's the foresight to anticipate high-stakes moments and position security validation as an accelerant, not a blocker.

90 days before your next major business event, ask yourself: "Do we have clean security validation, or are we gambling?"

The answer determines whether security becomes your secret weapon or your liability.

Want to map your business events to optimal pen test timing? We created a High-Stakes Security Timeline Planner that helps you identify your critical business moments and work backwards to the right testing windows.

Try our Strategic Testing Timeline Planner → adversis.github.io/testing-timeline

About This Series

This is part 3 of our Strategic CISO Series—a collection of guides focused on turning operational security work into strategic wins.

1. In Timing Your Security Assessment for Executive Impact, we talk about timing your pen test for maximum strategic impact—specifically around board presentations, compliance, and demonstrating continuous improvement.
2. In How to Say ‘We Need More Security Budget’ Without Saying ‘We’re Currently Insecure’, we talk about justifying security budget by breaking it into Table Stakes, Risk Reduction, and Business Enablement.
3. Part 3: The Pre-Mortem Pen Test: Using Security Assessments to Accelerate M&A, Funding, or Major Launches - This article is the intersection of the previous. It's strategic timing that unlocks business value and it's Business Enablement spending that directly impacts revenue, fundraising, and M&A.

Coming up

• Part 4: From Checkbox to Competitive Advantage: Positioning Your Security Posture Externally
• Part 5: The Quarterly Security Win: Manufacturing Visible Victories When Your Job Is Preventing Invisible Disasters

‍