
Buying cybersecurity services is uniquely challenging. The products are technical and hard to evaluate. The vendors speak in jargon and acronyms. The sales motion often involves fear—explicit or implied threats about what happens if you don’t buy.
This creates an information asymmetry that benefits sellers. Buyers overpay for services they don’t need, underbuy for services that matter, and struggle to evaluate whether they’re getting value.
This guide cuts through the fog. It covers common security service categories, what to look for, what questions to ask, and which sales tactics to recognize and resist.
First, understand what you’re buying. Security services cluster into a few categories:
Penetration testing: Offensive security professionals attempt to breach your systems, finding vulnerabilities and demonstrating exploitability.
Vulnerability assessment: Automated scanning plus analysis, identifying known vulnerabilities without exploitation.
Red team engagement: Extended adversary simulation testing detection and response, not just finding vulnerabilities.
Security program assessment: Review of policies, procedures, and program maturity against frameworks or best practices.
Compliance assessment: Evaluation against specific requirements (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI, HIPAA).
Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP): Outsourced security operations, typically including monitoring, alerting, and basic response.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR): More advanced than MSSP, with threat hunting, advanced detection, and active response capabilities.
Virtual CISO (vCISO): Fractional security leadership, providing strategic guidance without a full-time executive hire.
Managed vulnerability management: Outsourced scanning, prioritization, and remediation tracking.
Security tool implementation: Deploying and configuring security products (SIEM, EDR, IAM, etc.).
Architecture and design: Security architecture consulting for new environments or transformations.
Incident response: On-call or retainer-based response to security incidents.
Before category-specific evaluation, these questions apply broadly:
“Who specifically will work on our engagement?”
You’re not buying a company; you’re buying people’s time and expertise. Get specific:
Red flag: Evasive answers about staffing, or “we’ll assign the best available team” without specifics.
“What’s your team turnover rate?”
Security talent is scarce. High turnover means constant knowledge loss and inconsistent service quality.
Red flag: Dodging the question or turnover over 25% annually.
“Can we see sample deliverables?”
For assessment services, ask for redacted sample reports. For managed services, ask for sample dashboards or incident reports.
Red flag: “Our reports are proprietary” or inability to provide samples.
“Who are your reference customers?”
Ask for references in similar industries and of similar size. Actually call them.
Red flag: No references, or references that feel coached.
“What’s your methodology?”
Good security vendors can explain their approach clearly. Vagueness suggests either confusion or overreliance on automated tools.
Red flag: “We use our proprietary methodology” without explanation, or inability to describe the approach in plain terms.
“How long have you been doing this?”
Experience matters in security services. New firms can be excellent, but understand who’s behind them and their track record.
“What’s your specialization?”
Specialists typically outperform generalists. A firm that does only penetration testing is likely better at pentesting than a firm that does pentesting plus ten other things.
Red flag: “We do everything”—jacks of all trades, masters of none.
“What happens if something goes wrong?”
Insurance, liability provisions, incident response for their own mistakes. Understand what recourse you have.
What you’re looking for: Technical skill, methodology rigor, communication quality.
Questions to ask:
“Walk me through your pentest methodology.”
Good answer: Clear phases (recon, vulnerability identification, exploitation, post-exploitation), specific techniques, explanation of what they test and don’t test.
Bad answer: “We follow OWASP” (that’s a guideline, not a methodology) or vague descriptions.
“What tools do you use?”
Good answer: A mix of commercial tools, open-source tools, and custom scripts. Explains when automation is used vs. manual testing.
Bad answer: “Nessus and Metasploit” (pure automation isn’t pentesting—it’s vulnerability scanning).
“What do your reports look like?”
Good answer: Executive summary for leadership, technical details for remediation, proof-of-concept for critical findings, prioritized recommendations.
Bad answer: Automated scanner output with a cover page.
“How do you handle critical findings during the test?”
Good answer: Immediate notification process for critical vulnerabilities discovered during testing.
Bad answer: “We include everything in the final report” (unacceptable delay for critical findings).
Price benchmarks (rough ranges):
Below these ranges, question the depth. Above these ranges, question the value.
What you’re looking for: Detection capability, response speed, transparency, integration quality.
Questions to ask:
“What’s your mean time to detect and mean time to respond?”
Good answer: Specific metrics with methodology explanation. Different numbers for different severity levels.
Bad answer: “Industry-leading” without numbers, or numbers without methodology.
“What’s your false positive rate?”
Good answer: Honest acknowledgment of false positives and the process for tuning. Metrics on alert volume and true positive rate.
Bad answer: “Very low” without specifics, or claims of near-zero false positives (probably means they’re not detecting much).
“What access do you need to our environment?”
Good answer: Specific technical requirements, clear boundaries, explanation of data handling.
Bad answer: Vague requirements or “we’ll figure it out during onboarding.”
“What do you do when you detect something?”
Good answer: Clear escalation procedures, defined response actions, customer notification process.
Bad answer: “We alert you and you take action” (that’s monitoring, not managed response).
“How do you stay current on threats?”
Good answer: Threat intelligence sources, research team, detection engineering process.
Bad answer: “We use vendor threat feeds” (minimum viable, not differentiated).
Price benchmarks:
Price correlates with scope, detection depth, and response capability. Understand what you’re getting.
What you’re looking for: Relevant experience, strategic thinking, ability to operate in your context.
Questions to ask:
“What industries have you worked in?”
Industry experience matters. A vCISO from a regulated industry understands compliance; one from tech understands engineering culture. Match to your needs.
“What’s the split between strategic work and tactical work?”
Good answer: Clear understanding of the balance and flexibility to adjust.
Bad answer: “Whatever you need” (suggests no defined approach).
“How do you handle situations where leadership disagrees with your recommendations?”
Good answer: Experience navigating organizational politics, multiple approaches, understanding that advice not followed is still valuable.
Bad answer: “They should follow my recommendations” (tone-deaf to organizational reality).
“What’s your availability model?”
Good answer: Defined hours per month, clear response time expectations, escalation for urgent issues.
Bad answer: Vague “available as needed” without structure.
Price benchmarks:
Recognize these patterns:
“Did you see the breach at [company]? That could happen to you.”
Fear is a legitimate motivator, but vendors who lead with fear rather than value are manipulating emotions. Good vendors educate about risk; manipulative ones exploit it.
“Without this service, you’ll fail your audit.”
Maybe true, maybe not. Compliance requirements are often more flexible than vendors claim. Verify independently before accepting compliance justification.
“This service pays for itself through breach prevention savings.”
Breach cost calculations are speculative. ROI claims in security are almost always fabricated. Buy based on capability, not projected savings.
“This price is only available until Friday.”
Artificial urgency is a negotiation tactic. If the price is real, it’ll still be available next week. Vendors who need to close immediately have something to hide or quota to meet.
“We recommend our complete security platform for comprehensive protection.”
Bundled services often include things you don’t need. Evaluate each component. Sometimes bundles are cost-effective; sometimes they’re margin padding.
“Our team includes former NSA/CIA/FBI [impressive agency] experts.”
Government experience can be valuable. It’s also heavily marketed beyond its relevance. A former intelligence analyst may not be the best web application pentester. Evaluate specific skills, not impressive backgrounds.
You have more leverage than you think:
Multi-year commitments: Vendors love predictability. Commit to 2-3 years for 15-25% discounts on managed services.
Multiple services: Bundling genuinely does sometimes reduce costs, if you need the services.
Timing: End of quarter, end of fiscal year—vendors are motivated. Q4 is often the best time to negotiate.
Competitive bids: Get multiple quotes. Even if you prefer one vendor, competitive pressure improves terms.
Pilot periods: For managed services, negotiate 60-90 day pilots before full commitment.
Payment terms: Net-60 or annual billing can sometimes reduce costs.
When comparing vendors:
Define requirements first. Before talking to vendors, write down what you need. This prevents scope creep and sales-driven requirements expansion.
Get apples-to-apples proposals. Give all vendors the same scope and requirements. Custom proposals are hard to compare.
Weight criteria appropriately. Price matters, but so do quality, experience, and fit. Decide weightings before you see proposals.
Check references. Actually do this. Ask references about problems, not just successes.
Evaluate the team, not the pitch. Meet the people who will do the work, not just the sales team.
Consider the long term. Switching costs are real. A slightly more expensive vendor who’ll be a good partner for years may be better than the cheapest option.
Security services are expensive because security expertise is valuable. Pay for quality, but demand value—and don’t let fear drive your purchasing decisions.